September 4, 2008

Republican Neo-Permissiveness

Since when did we, as a nation, as concerned citizens, as parents, lose the capacity to judge babies having babies, to condemn teenagers having unprotected sex?

What will it do to every American mother's and father's ability to discourage their children from having sex before marriage and to insist, failing that, upon proper precautions not just against pregnancy but against deadly sexually transmitted diseases if we rollover to a wave of Republican permissiveness and install the bad example of Bristol and Levi in the White House?

Is it fair to Palin to hold her responsible for her daughter's mistakes?

Certainly not. It is horribly unfair.

But since when has the national interest become secondary to fairness to politicians?

Posted by rri

Why Bother

All Hail Freedonia!
Fragments
Google Giggles
Literacy and Its Discontents
Old and In the Way
On the Road
Pretty Vacant Video
Readers Notes
The Climate Suits My Clothes
The Net Takes You Nowhere
Time Keeps On Ticking
Weapons of Mass Distraction
Why indeed?

Links

Recent Posts

blue moon - 2009
Republican Neo-Permissiveness
50
Sweet Virginia
Fortune is a Woman
Hannah
Old And In The Way
Mock The Casbah
Scary Old Man
Lost Angeles
The Dog In The Temple
40+ Fairy Tales
The Ban on Negativity ;-)
The Travels of Mr. Derelict


Advertising

Shameless
Self-Promotion

Dog Friendly Beaches
Dog Friendly Beaches
Dog Beach, San Diego According to the City of San Diego, "This beach area is located at the west end of the San Diego River Floodway, also known as the Ocean Beach Flood Control Channel." Which means, as you can see from the picture below, some decade,....
from Old Doggie Co
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Copyright © 1998-2017
Why Bother | WhyBother.org